EN
Our website uses cookies. By browsing, you accept their use. See more in the Privacy Policy.     
Artificial Intelligence or Intelligent Assistants

Artificial Intelligence or Intelligent Assistants?

AI Agents, creativity and the path to practical value

Introduction

A useful thought from AI Forum 2025, recently: perhaps what we have today isn’t Artificial Intelligence (AI) but Intelligent Assistants (IA) that support human action. The hype cycle muddies expectations and no one can forecast with certainty what happens in 2, 5, or 10 years. What we can control is our posture: calm preparation, sensible adoption and clear purpose. The near-term opportunity isn’t to replace people, but to equip them with smarter tools.

A recent lecture by Dr. Lila Chrysikou, in Athens University of Economics and Business, reinforced another crucial point: creativity is not fixed; it’s trainable. Reports like the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs place creative thinking among the top skills shaping the workforce. Meanwhile, AI can regenerate knowledge, and not actually generate: what Gary Marcus calls an “illusion of intelligence.” So the practical question is: do we truly need Artificial Generative Intelligence (AGI), or do we need intelligent assistants that help people work better now?

What today’s AI does well

Where it struggles (for now)

Do we need AGI or better assistants?

AGI may arrive, or not. Either way, the pragmatic path is to deploy Intelligent Assistants: systems that are grounded in your data, governed by your rules, and designed to boost human creativity and judgment. Innovation is not the goal in itself, direction and outcomes are.

Creativity as a competitive advantage in an AI world

A practical framework to turn AI into ROI: A.G.I.L.E.

Align: define the outcome (cycle time, error rate, compliance, user experience).
Ground: anchor outputs in your documents and data; require citations.
Integrate: connect to ERP/CRM/CMS; value comes from moving data where work happens.
Limit risk: RBAC, encryption, retention, DPIAs/DPAs, human-in-the-loop.
Evaluate: instrument KPIs; run short pilots and iterate before scaling.

Decision guide: when to use generative AI vs rules

  1. Use generative AI for
    • Summaries, drafts, and rewrites.
    • Semantic search and Q&A grounded in your files (with citations).
    • Suggestions: classification, tagging, matching—reviewed by humans.
  2. Use deterministic/rule-based flows for
    • Compliance-critical steps (approvals, postings, sensitive actions).
    • Exact calculations and reconciliations.
    • Access control, retention, and audit trails.

Governance and safety essentials

KPIs worth tracking when adopting smart agentic tools

Conclusion

AI today is best understood as IA, intelligent assistants that help us do meaningful work faster and more reliably. Pair that capability with human creativity, sound governance, and clear outcomes, and you get real value, regardless of when (or whether) AGI arrives.

If you want to see how intelligent assistants can unlock value from your documents with safe, grounded answers and practical automations,book a short demo with PaperTrail.

Author

author Niki Katsaraki picture Niki Katsaraki linkedin icon
Niki is the COO and co-founder of PaperTrail when not dealing with everyday task she is planing her next traveling adventure.
BOOK A DEMO
PAPERTRAIL P.C.
Pl Ippodamias 8, Piraeus, 18531
Tax Number: 802948204
GEMI: 185983309000
Tel: 6988253626
Email: [email protected]

PaperTrail

Home
Blog
Log in
Book online demo

Terms of use

Privacy Policy

(c) 2023-2025 PaperΤrail. All rights reserved.